
My name is Bernard Damerval. I go to Highland Academy Charter School, where I am currently a Senior. For the past 4 years, I have participated in the TBA Theater youth academy programs, and in October 2018 I transitioned into the main company for public productions. My time in the theatre has given me confidence, and I am not afraid of public speaking. I joined theatre despite being somewhat socially awkward in part to address that problem, and it most certainly has. Doing a play puts a lot of pressure on a person, and as such I have also learned to stay calm under even significant pressure. I have found myself attracted to discussion as a source of learning and a chance to exercise my reasoning skills. My ability to analyze situations works well with my reasoning since it allows me to figure out what to do with my analysis.
However, my perception and analysis does lead to my most prominent fault: I am sometimes overwhelmed by it since it requires something to focus on to forget what’s going on around me. If too many things are going on, and especially if something has happened to stop me from focusing on anything like a headache, I am overwhelmed by the number of things assaulting my senses and can quickly become mildly irritable until given a moment to myself. During this time, I can also find it harder to reason because my head is swimming with countless things to interpret and think about. However, given a minute to collect myself, I can quickly overcome this and be back with improved performance, and if that minute is unavailable I still have enough theatre experience to put on a good face and enough patience not to escalate a situation with someone who might irk me.
I hope to go to Hillsdale College, and find a school of Law while I am there that would be a good fit for me. My dream is to eventually become a contract lawyer, and as such I have planned to pursue a degree in philosophy during college because research shows that philosophy degrees are one of the better ways to prepare for Law school. I wish to be a lawyer because it’s a profession that allows me to feel helpful, since people need lawyers at some point in their lives and only lawyers can fill that particular role. In addition, law often involves discussion of some sort. If the plan with law does not work out, in some way or another, my alternative plans are to go to work in real estate or the culinary field, becoming a small business owner.

The press has always held a lot of power in human society, and in all likelihood it always will. Our inherent inability to witness every single relevant event in our communities, small and large, leads to our dependence on a system for spreading important news through oral, written and, within the last century, audiovisual media. Within these media outlets, no matter their actual credibility, is the potential to sway the opinions of many. Furthermore, if all news outlets begin to say the same thing, a majority of people in the nation will end up believing the same thing. This is unavoidable even in a world where the free press makes up the vast majority of reliable sources: even free, it tends to report only the juiciest facts, those that people are willing to pay to hear.
However, what should be avoided at all costs is government control over the press. In nations where the press is controlled by an overarching government, that government has power over what people believe. The problem with this is it gives the government absolute power, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Though they remain a minority, there are increasing numbers of people who think that non-democratic military rule would not necessarily be a bad thing. In 1995, 1 in 16 people favored a military dictatorship government in the United States. Today, that ratio has more than doubled to 1 person in 6. Lest we forget, the clear and shocking problem with this is evidenced by the events in Cuba during the Communist revolution brought about by Fidel Castro. One of Castro and Guevara’s consistent missions was to get the people to adore them, and because of this most people in Cuba either remained oblivious to the large number of dead “political dissidents” or believed those deaths righteous, thinking that Castro and Guevara could not possibly be wrong. This example demonstrates with striking clarity that shirking our individual responsibility and letting a small group of people have free rein over the information disseminated in our society is a terrible idea.
We want for proof the proverb quoted earlier : Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Asserting that all the responsibility belongs to one power, say a congress of sorts, means that that congress gets all the power. They gain the ability to make all the decisions - when you get a job, when you have kids, what information you should be looking at, and so on. Because of this, they become corrupt, and begin making decisions of self-interest as opposed to public interest. The people end up miserable, but unable to do anything except hope that a violent revolution will resolve the crisis. The power is in the hands of the people, always, but that doesn’t mean the people don’t have to fight to reclaim that power on occasion.
Nor is such abuse confined to the annals of history. North Korea provides us with a chilling demonstration of the inherent evil that lay in falsifying the news through propaganda to serve the interests of a totalitarian government. When sources are controlled, the only news people hear is that which agrees with the government, and when the only information available presents facts in a certain light, people have no choice but to believe that specific set of facts. The ability of a government to control information ends up granting that government the ability to control the populace. If the populace believes every decision you make will be good, the chance of violent revolution from a people leading a miserable life grows more remote because they either no longer believe their lives will be permanently miserable, or they believe that they’re really not that miserable, at least not compared to the other nations of the world. If a government can convince people that they are not starving as much as the rest of the world, these people become happier than they should be with what the government is unjustly giving them. They end up allowing the powers that be to drive the entire country to the brink of destruction before they are able to do anything about it.
History, both ancient and modern, therefore shows us that it is folly to let the spread of information end up in the hands of authority; that the only authority allowed over media outlets should be, for better or for worse, the people themselves. They also show us that a free press engaged in a healthy critique of authority is necessary in order to keep said authority engaged in what should remain its primary mission - serving the people who elected it into existence. Accountability is the only check we can place on power. Free media are the only means to implement that accountability on behalf of the people. No healthy society or country can survive long without it.
History repeats itself. We all know and repeat this phrase time and time again. It is an observable fact of life. Many events, such as the rejection of new ideas like the existence of bacteria and the earth’s orbit, happened very separately but the reaction from the people was much the same. Another case of this is the World War II Operation Barbarossa, where Hitler attempted to invade the Soviet Union, and Napoleon’s attempts to invade russia, both failing for having arrived during Rasputitsa (Mud season), or simply Autumn in russia, where the air gets cold and autumnal rains fill the ground with mud that soldiers, horses, and tanks alike sink into.
The cyclical nature of human history is again demonstrated in the situation of the Arab Winter, an event of the modern day in which many arabian countries are rebelling against their tyrannical governments. The arab winter is thus, observably, a modern-day repeat of the 1848 European Revolutionary Period. People have always been in a cycle of dictatorship and revolution, as dictators arise from an excess of power and the people rebel against a tyrannical descendant of that dictator. Kings and queens arise in the same way, and the people rebel against them too, eventually. The people see kings and queens as glorified dictators, and dictators as renamed kings and queens. The 1848 European Revolutionary Period is an event in which the people rebelled against their kings, and the Arab Winter is an event in which people are rebelling against tyrants like Assad and political groups attempting to gain power.
A dictatorship or monarchy disregards the nature of man - freedom - in all but the case of the leaders, who abuse their freedom to the extreme in some cases and in others use it to massive benefit. Either way, power is in the hands of one major figure, and that does not suit the nature of man well. To see this, one must simply see the numerous but not completely counted number of rebellions against dictators or monarchs that have existed in the past, and exist in present. One might also see the wars waged against organizations that are bent on ruling the world under a certain set of rules, such as ISIL/ISIS, which intend to impose Sharia law upon many people whether they like it or not. There is an active war against these organizations by many countries in the world, even including Turkey, which is a mostly muslim country. These wars happen because it is the nature of man to be free.
If one were to take a good look at the Arab Winter and The 1848 Revolutions, there would be several similarities to plainly see. One such is the obvious; they are both multiple revolutions against governments by their people. The 1848 Revolutions addressed the presence of monarchs without the presence of a group that represented what the people actually wanted. Only in the cases of Denmark and France did it work, with the government and people quickly coming to a peaceful conclusion - in Denmark, because the reduced population and civic spirit allowed a consensus to arise, and in France, because the violence and horrors of the revolution were already behind them at that point - 1848 actually marked a brief return to royalty there, ending in 1852 to mostly unanimous conclusion. In the other european countries of the time, such as the Empire of Austria and the Kingdom of Prussia, the revolutions were violently quelled, with citizens being shot ruthlessly. In countries such as the United Kingdom (of ireland and great britain) the revolution simply didn’t manifest with the intensity required to provoke any governmental response. In a similar way, the Arab Winter is proving to be a revolution that provokes various reactions from governmental entities. The most famous example of this is the fact that Assad, current dictator of Syria, is slaughtering opponents and innocents alike, whether they spoke against him in the past or never said a word. The spillover of the Syrian Civil war is causing some degree of uproar in the Islamic world, and currently there are many North African countries such as Egypt that are experiencing a similar kind of trouble, though not to the same degree.
On the other hand, the presences of ISIS and ISIL are a major difference from the 1848 Revolutions. The 1848 Revolutions had no such outside international entity, and as such the governments were inclined simply to put down the people and be done with it. In the case of the Arab Winter, the government has to juggle dealing with the War on Terror and the domestic factions causing trouble within the country. ISIL bombed Turkey several times, and Turkey has since dragged the United States into the war. Turkey is one of the few Muslim-based countries to not be very affected by the Syrian Civil War internally, instead being able to focus entirely on quelling the influence of ISIL and ISIS in the Arab Winter, and the Middle East in general.
Both events, however, seem to be fairly localized. The middle east and europe, while both large, are separated in time and space, and neither revolution is relevant to the other. During the 1848 Revolutionary Period, the Ottomans had every opportunity to interfere with the revolutions in some way or another, and yet they didn’t. The closest any of the european powers got to calling for foreign aid was Austria calling for the help of the Polish in ending their rather violent rebellion. In just the same way, none of the Middle Eastern countries that are dealing with civil war have called upon foreign aid. Turkey called upon the US to help with the destruction of ISIL, and the US was already fighting ISIS, but Turkey is not dealing with civil war. Those countries that are dealing with civil war may not be asking for aid from the US for several reasons, including avoiding giving the appearance of siding with the United States.. One well-documented case of this is Assad, who appears to have established himself as the hate-figure of the entire United Nations, not to mention the United States.
This notwithstanding, the Arab Winter is also sometimes called the Syrian Civil War Spillover, due to it stemming from the Syrian Civil War. When one uses the term Arab Winter, they are talking about the events as a whole, however these are technically two separate events. The Syrian Civil War sparked a continually burning flame that manifests as the Arab Winter. On the other hand, the 1848 Revolutions started independently, though perhaps sparked on in some way by the french revolution 40 years earlier. However, they did not happen as a result of the French 1848 revolution, as that one was the fourth to happen in that group. We can thus observe that while the former appears to be a rapid succession of similar uproar taking place in rapid succession, the latter may be viewed as the result of a single uproar which had taken place some decades earlier.
The severity of the uproar in question is a similarity between the two events, as well. Demonstrations in the current middle east can range from peaceful protests to violent riots. Peaceful protests are often the result of people with high “thresholds” all gathering together in protest, without any of them daring to engage in acts of violence. Despite this, in some cases the military will still act violently in return, causing many deaths among the unsuspecting and non-retaliatory masses. In the 1848 Revolutions, the people also had many different kinds of demonstration, though in that time it was perhaps more common for them to execute people who were still loyal to the king and to drag nobles from their houses to be massacred by the dozens. There were some people in 1848 who held up signs in protest to government, and many other people who held up pitchforks and torches. The military reaction was even much the same, with peaceful and violent protests being taken down by force just as frequently as they are in the Arab Winter.
The final difference to make is with regards to technology and thus in the severity of the military response. For instance, in 1848 cannons would be fired at the crowd in an attempt to scare and/or kill protesters. This, while impactful for the time, does not compare to the horror caused when Assad’s military had rows upon rows of tanks roll into neighborhoods and shell them, killing thousands of innocents and protesters alike, during the Siege of Homs. In a similar way, muskets being fired in a line at a protesting group that may or may not have muskets themselves would lead to a more balanced conflict, while military grade automatic weapons and explosives unilaterally overwhelm even the most creative of violent protesters, coming up with homemade explosives and illegal weaponry. Bomb cars and suicide bombers cannot even begin to match the destruction caused when a city is carpet-bombed.
The severity of the 1848 military response was certainly plenty, enough to make all rebellions that warranted military intervention fail, however it remains a mystery to me as to how they were defeated so much faster than the Arab Winter. Perhaps it has to do with population, or the determination of the people involved. Perhaps firepower may not be as decisive as collective spirit when it comes to human conflict - the populations in 1848 were grappling with concepts that were fairly new, while today’s Arab populations live in countries where domestic Law and customs are increasingly at odds with the unavoidable feed of globalized communications showing them that different principles can thrive and endure. It may be no coincidence that before the change of power in Egypt in recent years, one of the tactics used by the conservative government was to cut off the internet to all its citizens.
When we compare the details of both series of events, we see that while both the 1848 revolution and the Arab Winter feature large scale internal conflicts, the latter is more global in scope, with interventions from multiple external powers in support of their own interests. The 1848 rebellions were just that, a group of rebellions, while the Arab Winter has evolved into a full-scale war between Assad and his people, Turkey and ISIL, and between the US and ISIS. It has become a matter that, if the UN were any more inclined to do things, would be at the top of their to-fix list.
However, discounting the wars on terror organizations, it becomes clear that these are entire cultures that rise up, not just individual groups of people. Many people had a similar or identical government to those found in europe at the time, however they did not have similar rebellions in that time frame. It was, for the most part, culturally Christian people who caused these rebellions. Christianity, after all, is a religion promoting freedom and respect for all, provided you hold the mainstream view of the Testaments. There were also Christian church radicals on the other side, and corrupt clergy all round, just as there seem to be many corrupt Islamic leaders who use Sharia law to seize control over others.
While demonstrations remained unpredictable and random, predicated as they were on the vagaries of daily life mingled with political strife, the military response did the exact opposite, staying rather consistent with its violent retaliations to peaceful and violent protests. There are, as in all things, some outliers, but they appear to be the exceptions that prove the rule. In this way, both seem to have gone in a similar way when it comes to the actions taken for and against the people. However, the keyword there is “similar” because the military reaction is so much more violent and destructive in the modern day that its impact cannot be reasonably compared to that of the 1848 militaries. However, it is a strange situation, since the 1848 revolutions seem to have had so much more effect on the populations that they affected, having rebellions only go on for a few weeks or months at a time, compared to the last seven years of the Arab Winter. Perhaps there is a connection between the level of atrocity and the severity of people’s reactions, causing a certain level to quell an uprising and anything above or below that to only feed it.
These two events complement each other. From researching one, information can readily be gleaned about the other. Each makes the other stand out, and yet somehow goes eerily with the other, like shadows reminiscent of multiple casting sources. Their similarities allow for a level of depth in one’s research that comes from viewing two related aspects of the same topic, which is what makes this one so interesting, as they appear to be from almost completely different topics.

Below are a few organizations I like to support, either by donating, volunteering, or promoting them on social media with my friends and colleagues.




I was fortunate enough to be born to a bilingual family. I was thus bilingual at an early age, and learning new languages was not as much of a challenge for me as it might otherwise have been. It is still a short list with some weak elements, but with time I hope to add to it and strengthen the ranks.
English
C2
I was born in Alaska, and US English is my native language on my mother's side.
I learned to read and write in it, used it at school and at home all my life,
and it is the language I am most comfortable expressing myself in.
French
C1
My father emigrated to the US from France, and almost always spoke French to me
as I was growing up. So did my grandparents - my grandfather, who has since passed away, and my grandmother, who is still
with us. I still speak it with her and my father. Reading and writing in it is more of a challenge, but I am fluent
in speaking and understanding it.
Italian
A2
I spent 6 months learning Italian to prepare for my trip to Italy in 2019.
I do not speak or understand it fluently but know enough to get by, and it served me well while I was there.
German
A1
I took a semester of German during my sophomore year at Highland. The class
was being assisted by a native student speaker. I look forward to brushing up my notions and one day visiting Germany
and Austria.
Polish
A1
I have been learning Polish through self-study ever since I represented Poland at
the Model UN conference in Anchorage, in 2018. I was fascinated by Poland and the Polish culture as a result, both
the people and the remarkable economic revival of Poland in the last couple of decades. I decided to learn the language
in order to visit Poland one day. Progress is slow because it is a complex language but I am not giving up!